The EDTX Criminal Defense Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal criminal practice in the Eastern District of Texas. Please email Carlo D'Angelo any news (including verdicts, rulings, etc) to be posted at carlo@dangelolegal.com
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Eleventh Grants Capital Habeas Relief, But Only After Applying "Double Deference" Standard to Ineffective Claim
Johnson v. Secretary, DOC, No. 09-15344 (11th Cir. June 14, 2011) Eleventh CIrcuit granted habeas to a Florida capital defendant sentenced to death in 1980 based on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Johnson, citing Harrington v. Richter, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 770, 785-86 (2011) Only if “there is no possibility fairminded jurists could disagree that the state court’s decision conflicts with [the Supreme] Court’s precedents” may relief be granted. Id., 131 S.Ct. at 786. When combined with the extra layer of deference that § 2254 provides, the result is double deference and the question becomes whether “there is any reasonable argument that counsel satisfiedStrickland’s deferential standard.” Id., 131 S.Ct. at 788.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment