In United States v. Hernandez, No. 10-10695 (5th Cir. July 18, 2011) (Jones, Higginbotham, Southwick), the Fifth held that the Government's use of the device to track Hernandez was not a search and therefore not a Fourth Amendment violation. The The Fifth reasons that the GPS device was no different than the electronic beeper at issue in United States v. Knotts which the Supreme Court held did not constitute a search or seizure.
The EDTX Criminal Defense Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal criminal practice in the Eastern District of Texas. Please email Carlo D'Angelo any news (including verdicts, rulings, etc) to be posted at carlo@dangelolegal.com
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment