"In light of the differing court decisions -- and the serious impact on the criminal justice system of continuing to impose unfair penalties -- I have reviewed our position regarding the applicability of the Fair Sentencing Act to cases sentenced on or after the date of enactment. While I continue to believe that the Savings Statute, 1 U.S.C. § 109, precludes application of the new mandatory minimums to those sentenced before the enactment of the Fair Sentencing Act, I agree with those courts that have held that Congress intended the Act not only to "restore fairness in federal cocaine sentencing policy" but to do so as expeditiously as possible and to all defendants sentenced on or after the enactment date. As a result, I have concluded that the law requires the application of the Act's new mandatory minimum sentencing provisions to all sentencings that occur on or after August 3, 2010, regardless of when the offense conduct took place. The law draws the line at August 3, however. The new provisions do not apply to sentences imposed prior to that date, whether or not they are final. Prosecutors are directed to act consistently with these legal principles."
The EDTX Criminal Defense Blog is dedicated to providing news and notes regarding federal criminal practice in the Eastern District of Texas. Please email Carlo D'Angelo any news (including verdicts, rulings, etc) to be posted at carlo@dangelolegal.com
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Sponsored by Tyler Criminal Defense Lawyer Carlo D'Angelo
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Attorney General Holder weighs in on FSA
On Friday, Attorney General Holder released a memo instructing AUSAs that the mandatory minimums set forth in the FSA of 2010 should apply to all defendant's sentenced on or after August 3, 2010.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment